Pages

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Develop physical market for commodities

It will help futures market, suffering from lack of multiple pricing points, succeed.

Futures exchanges apparently have difficulty in predicting the success or failure of futures contracts. Only 15 per cent of the contracts that are introduced survive before they get delisted.

Physical market size, risk-reduction ability of the contract, cash price variability and liquidity costs influence the volume of trade and open interest of futures contracts.

During 1994-98, 140 new commodity derivatives were introduced across the world. During 2005-13 almost the same number were introduced in Indian commodity futures. In India, major farm commodities such as cotton, oils and oilseeds and jute have lost their importance in the futures market arena.

A few other agricultural commodities such as guar, chana, castor, cottonseed oil cake, rubber and mentha oil display volumes though metals (precious and base) and energy products continue to preponderate on the commodity futures scene.

The attributes of commodity that are considered crucial for qualifying for futures trade are: Commodity should be durable and it should be possible to store it; units must be homogeneous; commodity must be subject to frequent price fluctuations with wide amplitude; supply and demand must be large; supply must flow naturally to market and there must be breakdowns in an existing pattern of forward contracting.

Though the attributes mentioned above answers the question whether commodities are suitable for futures trade, however, it does not answer a more important complementary question whether the market will adopt a commodity contract for trade or not.

The economic utility of a commodity futures contract for effective price discovery and efficient price risk management depends on wide participation of the physical trade in the commodity and also non-commercial participation, giving it a desired equilibrium.

Lack of multiple pricing points in physical market and supplier concentration often causes contract failure. Energy futures contracts without the participation of the energy players (crude and natural gas producers and users) would have sufficient ingredient for failure. A market deserted by hedgers is unlikely to survive for long, as it will surely be neglected by speculators.

Without getting into the argument of “chicken or the egg”, we need to appreciate that a futures market for any commodity presupposes a close correlation between the prices in physical market.

And if the landscape of the country for the commodity has a controlled price mechanism or an oligopolistic market structure, the futures contract will have very remote chances of success beyond a certain time, however well the contracts may have been designed.

It is important that the country should direct its efforts toward developing active physical cash market with multiple players and multiple pricing points, the success of futures market will follow naturally.